Work stays in your workflow.
Work runs in your GitHub Actions, with the code and review in your existing workflow.
Free invited beta
Turn user feedback into a change you’ve chosen. Review the plan, choose when Claude starts, then review the pull request before anything ships.
Runs in your own GitHub Actions, using your own Claude subscription or API key.
Claude may ask a question or stop instead of opening a PR.
Free invited beta · npm projects · Claude Code · owners sign in with ChatGPT
How it works
You choose the plan, when to run it, and what ships.
Collect suggestions, missing features and confusing screens, with screenshots or annotations when useful.
Feedback with contextReview the evidence and edit the plan. Approving a plan does not start a run; you choose when Claude begins.
Approve, edit or deferThe coding job runs in your repository’s GitHub Actions, using your own Claude credentials held in your GitHub secrets.
You press RunSee what changed, the checks that ran, and anything still uncertain. Claude may ask a question or stop instead. You decide whether to merge and release.
Review before releaseYour own link opens the same feedback panel; the floating button is optional. *Custom forms require same-origin requests and verification. The MCP connector lets owners work with collected feedback in their assistant.
Planned Email-in to support@patchkind.com · Slack / Discord commands · Imports from GitHub Issues, Intercom and Zendesk · A docs “Was this helpful?” widget. These aren’t available yet; the support address currently handles support only.
What you see as the owner
Example data. Fictional projects, people and tasks in the real workspace. Select a screen to see it full size.



What you control
Work runs in your GitHub Actions, with the code and review in your existing workflow.
Use your Claude subscription token or API key. Patchkind does not collect either. Subscription usage limits and GitHub Actions usage still apply.
Set the approved scope. Review the resulting pull request. Patchkind never automatically merges it.
Keep the original report, the agreed change and the result together. Pick up a small improvement without reconstructing the conversation or handing your product over to an unattended agent.
The AlgoThesis trial
A supervised trial on our owner’s own app. The four changes were verified live on 5 October 2026.
Read the full case study How the Claude Code workflow runs#720 (private repository)#723 (private repository)#724 (private repository)#725 (private repository)The AlgoThesis repository is private; screenshots of the live changes are shown in the case study. One earlier PR targeted the wrong page and was closed. A follow-up improved the first change. These were small fixes, with human decisions throughout.
Evidence, not a promise of perfection
In our supervised AlgoThesis trial, we included requests to expose secrets and alter protected files. Our verifier reported that Claude ignored those instructions and changed only the page it was asked to.
The same run also tripped our protected-path check because of a packaging bug of ours: empty placeholder files. We fixed it. The check caught that bug, not a hostile edit.
This is evidence from a bounded test, not a guarantee that every malicious report or incorrect change will be caught.
Attack run 37274899273 · no PR opened (private repository)
Beta expectations
Claude can ask for clarification, fail a check or stop without opening a PR. Autopilot, self-serve onboarding and notification emails are not promises of this beta.
Request an invitation for your project. This is an access request, not instant sign-up.
Request free beta access Questions? support@patchkind.comOptional AI follow-up questions and feedback summaries use OpenAI and can send feedback text and screenshots to that provider. This is separate from your Claude coding run. Privacy & data
Screenshots add context; a passing build does not confirm the visual result.